On July 2, 2026, Justice Musa Liman of the Federal High Court reportedly held that the David Mark-led executive of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) was authentic and legally constituted.
However, on November 5, 2026, another judge of the Federal High Court, Justice Peter Lifu, reportedly ruled that the same David Mark-led ADC executive was illegal.
The two decisions, emanating from courts of coordinate jurisdiction, have sparked debate and confusion among political observers, party members, and legal analysts. Many Nigerians are questioning how two courts of equal standing could arrive at seemingly contradictory conclusions on the same leadership dispute.
The development once again highlights the complexities of Nigeria’s judicial and political landscape, where conflicting court decisions on party affairs often generate uncertainty and create room for prolonged legal battles.
For many citizens trying to make sense of the situation, the apparent contradiction raises concerns about consistency in judicial pronouncements and the implications for political stability and party administration.
As the legal contest continues, the matter may ultimately require clarification by a higher court to provide a definitive position on the legitimacy of the ADC leadership structure.
Just as Richard Akinnola, a veteran journalist and seasoned legal practitioner humorously put it: “July 2: David Mark-led ADC executive is authentic and legal. November 5: David Mark-led ADC executive is illegal.
Same Federal High Court. Same coordinate jurisdiction.
At this point, make I just mind my business abeg.”
The irony may draw laughter, but it also reflects the frustration of many Nigerians seeking clarity and certainty in legal and political matters.
Veracity Desk (veracitydesk.com) Editorial, November 6, 2026
